/* ------------------- begin IP Block script ------------------- Block IP address script Points to php script on blog.racetotheright.com IP addresses are within the script ---------- */ /* -------------------- end IP Block script ------------------- */

Thursday, June 09, 2005

Eibensteiner as GOP Chair Again

--posted by Tony Garcia on 6/09/2005

In 2 days in St. Louis Park, the 347-member Republican State Board Committee will elect a chairman for a two-year term. God willing it will be Bill Pulkrabek for Chair and Ron Carey for Vice Chair.

It seems that they usually correct blog Kennedy v The Machine is now supporting Ron Eibensteiner for re-election as MN GOP Party Chair. This is a mistake.

Margaret at Our House lists only a few of the reasons that Ron needs to be kicked to the curb unceremoniously.

Here is my take.

Was it not Eibenstiener who withheld financial support from the Senate Republicans in 2002 because of a pissing match with Dick Day? It was. And his inability to put his position above his petty schoolyard mentality cost the MN GOP a great chance to capture the State Senate. We had the momentum then that has not been recaptured since. Ron cannot understand the the job of the party chair is NOT to pick who should be endorsed. That is the job of the district alone. The party chair's job is to respect the wishes of the party delegates' endorsements and get those people elected. He does not even know his job and people in the party are seriously considering re-electing him. And I thought the DFL had moron-chip issues.

Is it not a fact that we concede by running crappy candidates (stiffs who don't want to run, like Amanda Hutchins) in almost 30 races for the House...under Eibensteiner? It is a fact. To give up on that many districts is reprehensible from a "leader".

As a major party in Minnesota should we accept a leader who allowed the GOP to finish 3rd in a House race to the Green Party? I say no. Any leader in office at the time should be held accountable for allowing the party to finish behind a 3rd Party. (I know they are considered a major party in MN, but they perform like a 3rd Party in the results.)

I'm too tired to pull the 2004 election results with my notes out of the file cabinet so this is from memory. You will get the point. Should we re-elect a leader under whom the party lost 12 of 13 "close" (won by margins of 4% or less) races? He's like the Vikings in Super Bowls: Always enough to get there but never enough to win.

As a Republican who wants a party of Right (vs Left) and Right (vs Wrong) I find it onerous that Eibensteiner would nominate a crook in Eric Hoplin...the thief who personally signed fundraising letters that swindled elderly out of their money only to pour 90% back into fundraising and then blamed the elderly for it all.

Minority status almost happened in 2004 in the MN House because of Ron's personal issues and incompetence. Bush might have won MN had there been a competent get-out-the-vote movement. From what I witnessed there was NONE on campus, there was MINIMAL recruiting done in my home county and Kerry's supporters kicked Bush's ass in MN in lawn signs, buttons and stickers. Why? Because the MN GOP was too cheap to GIVE buttons away. They would only sell them which limited the number who wore the buttons, which limited the number who saw the buttons and that psychological kick in the teeth is more important than the politicos in the MN GOP understand.

Eibensteiner killed the MN GOP momentum. We got lucky that we had 2 good candidates for Governor (though I will not vote for Pawlenty again due to his endorsement of Eibensteiner and Hoplin-the-crook) and a bad DFL candidate. We won the Governor's Mansion despite Ron's abject incompetence. In 2002 Coleman (a bad candidate and a RINO for Senator) won ONLY because of the Wellstone Memorial/Rally. We got a moderate-right Senator despite Ron's failure as a leader.

Consider that until election day Kennedy was considered vulnerable. The fact that an incumbent in a body where 98% of its members win re-election had to fight too hard for his seat shows a failure on the MN GOP leadership to help with the fight. Poor use of resources if you ask me. Oh, and to top it off Kennedy's race was in a very conservative (for the most part) district against a socialist freak who wants to fight the war on terror at home instead of abroad and had no platform at all as of 8 months prior to the elections.

Unacceptable.

Three years ago Minnesota was correctly being labled as moving towards the middle, even moving to the right. Now we can barely keep the House, the Senate seems like a pipe dream and the Governor seems to very vulnerable. We have about 25% of the House races lost by over 50%.

That is not a leader. And that is not the mark of a person that will be the chair of a party that I'm in. I will not work for him, he shows no support for the grass roots workers. If he is chair then you can count on my contributions to the state party finacially to be a total of a quarter in nickel increments and requesting a Political Contribution Receipt to be mailed each time. You can count on my withdrawing my time and labor from the state party. I think it is folly to waste time on trying to make the Titanic float...just call Ron "Captain Smith". And since the College Republicans (run predominately by crooked thugs for years) is the MN GOP youth outreach the party seems to be on shaky ground for the future as well.

I'm not leaving the party...the party is leaving me. If Eibensteiner and Hoplin win I likely will think I will complete the move from the MN Republican party to a different party...resigning as a delegate and withdrawing my services. Will that be a good thing for the party? I don't know. After all, I do live in a district that will be an open seat for Congress in 2006 and need ground work.

Consider this as well. When John F Kennedy was killed and Lyndon B Johnson took over he appointed Robert Kennedy to be his Atty Gen even though they hated each other more than the left hate Scalia. LBJ was asked why and the answer was typical Texas charm: "I'd rather have that son-of-a-bitch inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in.

Bottom line: Select Eibensteiner and you are guaranteed to be taken to the cleaners by a very fractured and disorganized DFL over the next 4-6 years (the damage will be long-term). Boot Eibensteiner and the same might happen, but at least it is not a guarantee. Select Hoplin and the Strib, Pioneer Press and New York Times will eventually have a field day regarding more scandals that border criminal.

5 Comments:

Blogger Tony Garcia said...

I think you missed a key phrase in the comment about Kennedy: "Consider that until election day Kennedy was considered vulnerable". It was the whisper throughout the circles I was in that Kennedy had a slim lead at best and likely was behind at various points.

Regardless of why Wetterling got her votes she got them. I find it interesting that while listing a long list of failures you only address ONE of them (and badly at that).

At least the Green, Constitution and Libertarian parties understand how to foster grassroots...something the MN GOP at the state level has not done.

What is the value of Gov Pawlenty? He is (1) endorsing Hoplin, a crook (2) reneging on his campaign promises (3) finding the slimy-politician way around his no-taxes pledge. "Fees"! Give me a break. Tell him to govern today for what is right and then run on that record in 2006 instead of governing for 2006.

Sincerely, if I stay in the party and Ron/Eric win the MN GOP will get $.25 per year in 5 installments of $.05 with the demand for a PCR mailed to me for each contribution. The Ron-publican Party of MN will get the respect from me that they have shown the locals: NONE. They will get from me the work that recipricates the locality support they give: NONE.

June 10, 2005  
Blogger Jerry Plagge, Jr. said...

OK, I'll dispute another point then, I hope you judge mine more worthy.

Fact check on Hutchings and a comment:

Here are '04 results for 59B
Kahn (DFL) 58.85%
Hutchings (R) 22.40%
Smith (Green) 12.66%
Lischeid (I) 5.78%

Have you looked at 59B on the map? It is a socialist enclave!

I don't invest my money in stocks that I really like, knowing they will never succeed, so why invest $$ and invaluable volunteer time in races that have little to no hope.

Then you have a district like mine (63A) where a Republican win is possible, but it would take one great candidate and a lot of time and money.

In CD5 we barely put up a fight because of Sabo and the DFL's stranglehold on the district. I wish we would fight harder, but the chances are slim to miniscule at best.

June 10, 2005  
Blogger Tony Garcia said...

Fair comment. My response is that I brought up Amanda for a specific reason. She is typical of the candidates in those conceded districts. I know from a very close source to her campaign that she did NOTHING. (Did I mention that she was a CR? This is why I fear for the future of the GOP.)

She did NOTHING and got 22%. She went to Chicago to be with her boyfriend instead of campaigning. There was no effort and this is given excuses. I thought that the GOP was about responsibility and consequenses. For the incompetence of the leadership in those areas (and others) they are blessed by wagon circling excuses.

Instead we need to find leadership that will find good, hard-working candidates and then support them if they are endorsed.

Yes, we write off the 5th. Now we write off the 4th. In the meantime similar GOP strongholds are given runs for their money (see CD 6) by the DFL.

They are trying to win every race...even the ones that are impossible. We need leadership that can manage the party resources well enough to do the same and that is obviously not Ron. Instead he concedes dozens of races.

Look at the results and tell me how many districts the DFL won by 50% or more. Now tell me how many the GOP won by 30% or more. That is the sign of piss-poor leadership, horse-***t resource management and pure incompetence.

June 10, 2005  
Blogger Jerry Plagge, Jr. said...

In SD63, we in the BPOU are the ones who find and support the local candidates. I'll agree that if a district does not have any sort of leadership in the local BPOUs then the state leadership needs to step in to help, but if a SD has decent to strong leadership group then it is up to them to put up candidates that will work hard and fight.

I know SD63 is ready to do fight at the local level!

As for CD5, it is depressing if you look at the numbers, but to your point it would be nice if we at least put up a fight so the DFL would have to at least expend some resources.

On this note, CD5 is sponsoring a leadership one-day camp in July.

June 10, 2005  
Blogger Tony Garcia said...

See, at the local level you find the candidates. Once found they should get lots of support from the party regardless of their positions. That is not happening from Ron & Co.

If need be, find GOPers who are left of center (like Ah-nold in California or Arne Carlson). The important thing is to get a GOPer that can run strong in all districts.

June 10, 2005  

Post a Comment

<< Home