Americana and God under attack again
--posted by Tony Garcia on 7/18/2005Just when you thought America's traditions were safe from Michael Newdow he returns.
Remember Newdow? He was the atheist who sued his daughter's school because she was being forced to recite the Pledge of Allegiance (*gasp*) and it contained the phrase "Under God" in it (*gasp*). Remember his claim that his daughter was traumatized by being forced to utter the Pledge of Allegiance. And then it turned out that not only did he not have custody of the girl, thus making him unable to file suit as her representative, but she did not mind the Pledge or God.
Well, he's back. He also got a bit of a smackdown.
Michael Newdow, a doctor and lawyer, is suing four Sacramento-area school districts on behalf several atheist children and their families.
...
Newdow suffered a setback Monday in his latest case when the judge said he plans to throw out several parts of Newdow's lawsuit.
U.S. District Judge Lawrence Karlton indicated that he planned to block Newdow from having the pledge itself and the words "under God" declared unconstitutional. His lawsuit instead would focus strictly on whether reciting the pledge in public schools is an unconstitutional endorsement of religion, meaning Newdow could still have the pledge barred from schools if he prevails in the long-shot effort.
Well, good. Though I am not a religious person I find it to be a horrible road that the nation is travelling by pushing for a freedom FROM religion.
Then Newdow shows exactly how out-to-lunch he is. "We're a despised minority." Michael, you have it wrong. Atheists are not despised. In fact the belief itself is respected. It is the activists like yourself who are trying to impose your worldview on everyone that are despised.
2 Comments:
And somehow forcing an atheist to recite a pledge with the words "under God" is not imposing your world view on them?
What if instead of "under God" the pledge read "under Allah" or "under Mohammad"? Would you want to recite that pledge?
Keep tearing down the wall between church and state and it could happen someday should Muslims make up a majority of Americans.
Me, I prefer the pre-1954 version which made no reference to God.
No one is forced to recite the Pledge. Thus, nobody is being forced against their beliefs.
What the militant-our-view-must-be-law atheists are trying to do is force religious people to leave their beliefs at the door.
Hmm, let's see, militant atheists world view: noone may practice their beliefs.
Everyone else: everyone may practice their beliefs, none are forced to practice those of others.
You don't like the Pledge then don't recite it.
Post a Comment
<< Home