/* ------------------- begin IP Block script ------------------- Block IP address script Points to php script on blog.racetotheright.com IP addresses are within the script ---------- */ /* -------------------- end IP Block script ------------------- */

Friday, September 30, 2005

Light blogging

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/30/2005

Actually probably closer to NO blogging this weekend. I have a wedding to attend and so my time between the associated wedding stuff starting this afternoon and show prep (shoved somewhere in between wedding things) will take up all of my time.

Have a good weekend.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Thursday, September 29, 2005

Which is your ideal nominee

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/29/2005

Which nominee is up your alley? Take the quiz to find out.

I guess this is mine:
JUDGE EDITH HOLLAN JONES
JUDGE EDITH HOLLAN JONES
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, appointed by Reagan, born 1949. A Texan! Nearly nominated to Souter's seat by G.H.W. Bush. You're hoping the son follows through! Jones is considered radioactive by Democrats, which you (and the administration) might consider a plus!

Here is a neat little rundown of the possible nominees. My other favorites: Miguel Estrada and Janice Rogers Brown.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Duluth Mayor is a coward

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/29/2005

(H/T: MDE)

On Monday night, September 26th, Duluth Mayor Herb Bergson fired Duluth's chief administrative officer, Mark Winson. In a truly classless way Bergson left a meeting that both were in. After the meeting Winson went to his office and found a termination letter taped to his door. Oh, Bergson, by the way, went out of town so he does not even have to face Winson.

In the letter Bergson said he considered Winson a friend. Really? So you fire a friend for "philosophical differences" by leaving a meeting to tape a "pink slip" to your friend's door as you skip town.

Oh yeah, and you give your friend 3 days to get the hell out, but make sure your stuff is out be the next day. Some friend.

What kills me about the termination letter is that Mayor Bergson is firing his "friend" Winson for ""philosophical differences" that "are apparently insurmountable". And then Bergson says he "made this decision without any personal feelings becoming involved..." You mean aside from the feelings of not having someone to parrot your views. Basically Bergson wants a form of groupthink to run Duluth.

Well, Duluth, you get what you deserve. You elected that gutless guy.
***** 1 refutations and clarifications *****

Rowley blames Kline for DeLay

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/29/2005

Just received this e-mail from Democrat 2nd District hopeful Coleen Rowley.
You've probably heard the news by now that House Majority Leader Tom Delay has been indicted by a grand jury in Texas on a felony count of criminal conspiracy for violating election laws. Here’s what you might not have heard:

In November of 2004, House Republicans voted secretly to change the long established House Ethics Rules in an attempt to protect Mr. Delay from having to step down as House Majority Leader should he ever be indicted. Despite public outrage, my opponent John Kline has not owned up to his vote on changing the rules to protect violators in powerful positions. Small wonder, given the fact Mr. Kline has accepted $30,000 in campaign funds, and a maximum of $10,000 in 2004 from Mr. Delay’s PAC. Small wonder he voted with Mr. Delay and Republican leadership 99% of the time in 2004.

The news about Mr. DeLay, taken together with how closely my opponent Mr. Kline is tied to Mr. DeLay's money machine, illustrates clearly what we're up against.

Minnesota's 2nd Congressional District deserves better than Mr. Kline.

Uh, is DeLay's PAC that gave to Kline one that is for GOP candidates?

Seriously, look at the charge that Rowley makes.
(1) Kline needs to be replaced because he votes in a similar way to Tom DeLay. Why not attack Kline's votes instead of the guilt by association? You are a lawyer, you should know better. If you want to play that game then I feel obligated to remind you of your own questionable associations.
(2) Kline needs to be replaced because of ties to an indicted DeLay. Again, the guilt by association. Worse is Rowley's philosophy that someone is guilty until proven innocent. Rowley should understand the process of the legal system. An indictment is NOT a guilty verdict.

This memo is actually more telling about Rowley's positions than one would believe. First, she has very little platform that she wants to project. She is using hyperbole.

Second, this is an indication of her understanding of the United States legal system. She is making someone (Kline) out to be unworthy (guilty) by association with another person whom she is treating as guilty before proven otherwise.

If this is the type of legal competency we are witnessing from a former lawyer imagine how bad her competency will be on issues that she has very little insight on.

Finally, Coleen, can we have your sources, please?
***** 3 refutations and clarifications *****

Roberts is confirmed

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/29/2005

John Roberts is officially confirmed as of now by the Senate to become the Chief Justice of the United States of America.

The tally: 78-22

How did they each vote? See below.

Akaka, Daniel Kahikina --- (D), HI---nay
Alexander, Lamar ---(R), TN---yea
Allard, Wayne ---(R), CO---yea
Allen, George ---(R), VA---yea
Baucus, Max ---(D), MT---yea
Bayh, Evan ---(D), IN---nay
Bennett, Bob ---(R), UT---yea
Biden, Joseph R. ---(D), DE---nay
Bingaman, Jeff ---(D), NM---yea
Bond, Kit ---(R), MO---yea
Boxer, Barbara ---(D), CA---nay
Brownback, Sam ---(R), KS---yea
Bunning, Jim ---(R), KY---yea
Burns, Conrad ---(R), MT---yea
Burr, Richard ---(R), NC---yea
Byrd, Robert C. ---(D), WV---yea
Cantwell, Maria ---(D), WA---nay
Carper, Tom ---(D), DE---yea
Chafee, Lincoln ---(R), RI---yea
Chambliss, Saxby ---(R), GA---yea
Clinton, Hillary Rodham ---(D), NY---nay
Coburn, Tom ---(R), OK---yea
Cochran, Thad ---(R), MS---yea
Coleman, Norm ---(R), MN---yea
Collins, Susan ---(R), ME---yea
Conrad, Kent ---(D), ND---yea
Cornyn, John ---(R), TX---yea
Corzine, Jon S. ---(D), NJ---nay
Craig, Larry ---(R), ID---yea
Crapo, Mike ---(R), ID---yea
Dayton, Mark ---(D), MN---nay
DeMint, Jim ---(R), SC---yea
DeWine, Mike ---(R), OH---yea
Dodd, Chris ---(D), CT---yea
Dole, Elizabeth ---(R), NC---yea
Domenici, Pete V. ---(R), NM---yea
Dorgan, Byron L. ---(D), ND---yea
Durbin, Dick ---(D), IL---nay
Ensign, John ---(R), NV---yea
Enzi, Mike ---(R), WY---yea
Feingold, Russ ---(D), WI---yea
Feinstein, Dianne ---(D), CA---nay
Frist, Bill ---(R), TN---yea
Graham, Lindsey ---(R), SC---yea
Grassley, Chuck ---(R), IA---yea
Gregg, Judd ---(R), NH---yea
Hagel, Chuck ---(R), NE---yea
Harkin, Tom ---(D), IA---nay
Hatch, Orrin G. ---(R), UT---yea
Hutchison, Kay Bailey ---(R), TX---yea
Inhofe, James M. ---(R), OK---yea
Inouye, Daniel K. ---(D), HI---nay
Isakson, Johnny ---(R), GA---yea
Jeffords, Jim ---(I), VT---yea
Johnson, Tim ---(D), SD---yea
Kennedy, Edward M. ---(D), MA---nay
Kerry, John ---(D), MA---nay
Kohl, Herb ---(D), WI---yea
Kyl, John ---(R), AZ---yea
Landrieu, Mary L. ---(D), LA---yea
Lautenberg, Frank R. ---(D), NJ---nay
Leahy, Patrick ---(D), VT---yea
Levin, Carl ---(D), MI---yea
Lieberman, Joe ---(D), CT---yea
Lincoln, Blanche ---(D), AR---yea
Lott, Trent ---(R), MS---yea
Lugar, Richard G. ---(R), IN---yea
Martinez, Mel ---(R), FL---yea
McCain, John ---(R), AZ---yea
McConnell, Mitch ---(R), KY---yea
Mikulski, Barbara ---(D), MD---nay
Murkowski, Lisa ---(R), AK---yea
Murray, Patty ---(D), WA---yea
Nelson, Ben ---(D), NE---yea
Nelson, Bill ---(D), FL---yea
Obama, Barrack ---(D), IL---nay
Pryor, Mark ---(D), AR---yea
Reed, Jack ---(D), RI---nay
Reid, Harry ---(D), NV---nay
Roberts, Pat ---(R), KS---yea
Rockefeller, Jay ---(D), WV---yea
Salazar, Ken ---(D), CO---yea
Santorum, Rick ---(R), PA---yea
Sarbanes, Paul S. ---(D), MD---nay
Schumer, Charles E. (Chuck ), ---(D), NY---nay
Sessions, Jeff ---(R), AL---yea
Shelby, Richard C. ---(R), AL---yea
Smith, Gordon H. ---(R), OR---yea
Snowe, Olympia J. ---(R), ME---yea
Specter, Arlen ---(R), PA---yea
Stabenow, Debbie ---(D), MI---nay
Stevens, Ted ---(R), AK---yea
Sununu, John E. ---(R), NH---yea
Talent, Jim ---(R), MO---yea
Thomas, Craig ---(R), WY---yea
Thune, John ---(R), SD---yea
Vitter, David ---(R), LA---yea
Voinovich, George V. ---(R), OH---yea
Warner, John ---(R), VA---yea
Wyden, Ron ---(D), OR---yea
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Wednesday, September 28, 2005

How the Democrats are stacking up for tomorrow

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/28/2005

According to the Guardian the following is how 29 of the 44 Democrats will vote tomorrow on confirmation of John Roberts as Chief Justice of the USA.

States color coded by 2004 Presidential Results.
Democrats who have announced their support for Roberts (13):
Max Baucus (MT), Jeff Bingaman (NM*), Robert Byrd (WV*), Kent Conrad (ND*), Russ Feingold (WI), Tim Johnson (SD), Herb Kohl (WI*), Mary Landrieu (LA), Patrick Leahy (VT), Ben Nelson (NE*), Bill Nelson (FL*), Mark Pryor (AR) and Ken Salazar (CO).

Democrats who have announced their opposition (16):
Evan Bayh (IN), Joseph Biden (DE), Barbara Boxer (CA), Hillary Rodham Clinton (NY*), Jon Corzine (NJ*), Mark Dayton (MN*), Dick Durbin (IL), Dianne Feinstein (CA*), Edward Kennedy (MA*), John Kerry (MA), Frank Lautenberg (NJ), Barbara Mikulski (MD), Barack Obama (IL), Harry Reid (NV), Charles Schumer (NY) and Debbie Stabenow (MI*).

*Seat is up for election in 2006

Observations about the 29 Democrats:
Of those who are up for election next year and are from Bush states all are supporting Roberts.
Of those who are up for election next year and are from Kerry states all are opposing Roberts...with one exception: Herb Kohl (WI).
Only two red state Senators have announced opposition to Roberts.
Only three blue state Senators have announced their support for Roberts...two of them are from Wisconsin.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Past confirmations

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/28/2005

Advise & consent. You will hear that often as the Democrats try to justify any opposition against both Roberts and Bush's next nominee. Just remember that as far as the advice goes George Washington set the precedent long ago that he made his own appointments and the Senate had no input in the choice. The only role of the Senate was to pass or fail the confirmation.

That is how it should be. The Senators that think they deserve to be consulted are a little bit full of themselves.

Consent--that should be strictly to determine if the nominee is capable not if their ideology is acceptable.

In reviewing the past nomination votes I thought I would look a little deeper into the dissenting votes.

Breyer's dissenters (Conrad Burns (R-MT), Daniel R. Coates (R-IN), Paul Coverdell (R-GA), Jesse Helms (R-NC), Trent Lott (R-MS), Frank H. Murkowski (R-AK), Don Nickles (R-OK), and Robert C. Smith (R-NH)) mostly cited ethics concerns. What concerns?
Breyer's largest hurdle came when Newsday broke a story indicating that he had investments in some of Lloyd's of London's insurance syndicates. Senators argued that his investments would create conflicts of interest if Breyer would be presented with "Superfund" cases that could affect Lloyd's potential liability. In the hearings Breyer promised to sell off his investments in Lloyds, and to make all of his investments public. However, as the confirmation process was winding down Newsday further exposed Breyer as having been on a three-judge panel in a pollution case where the Kayser-Roth Corporation was sued by Lloyd's of London after being held accountable for cleaning up the site of a chemical spill. The case demonstrated that he had failed to recognize that he had a conflict of interest. (Lloyd's was directly involved in the case, but it was uncertain if his syndicates were.)

Source: History News Network

I think that more should have voted against Breyer.

Ginsburg's dissenters (Jesse Helms (R-NC), Don Nichols (R-OK), and Robert C. Smith (R-NH)) cited ideological issues. Helms specifically cited Ginsburg's pro-gay positions as his reason for opposition.

Sorry, but all three were out of line. Ideology should NEVER be a part of the nomination process.

What happened to Bork is a bastardization of the process. He was voted down strictly for ideology.

What happened to Thomas was initiated because of ideology (and may those people get the justice they deserve) but the confirmation process did bring about some serious questions about ethics. We can only assume that the Senators who voted for Thomas felt those questions were resolved and those who voted against felt those questions left legitimate concerns. Either way, this is what the process is supposed to be about. Is the person fit in character (not politics and philosophy) to be on the Court.

Nothing more, nothing less.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Previous confirmation votes

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/28/2005

On the eve of the confirmation vote for John Roberts nomination as Chief Justice of the United States I thought it might be interesting to see how the previous confirmation votes went.

Stephen Breyer, 87-9, 1994.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 96-3, 1993
Clarence Thomas, 52-48, 1991, "yea"--41 Republicans & 11 Democrats, "nay"--46 Democrats & 2 Republicans.
David Souter, 90-9, 1990.
Anthony Kennedy, 97-0, 1988.
Antonin Scalia, 98-0, 1986.
Sandra Day O'Connor, 99-0, 1981.
John Paul Stevens, 99-0, 1975.
William Rehnquist, 68–26, 1971; for Chief Justice, 65–33, 1986.

Really, there is very little justification for those who will oppose Roberts to do so.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Canadian columnist hits nail on the head

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/28/2005

(H/T: my mother)
David Warren wrote an article a few weeks ago about the American Left's (and global left's) blame game regarding Katrina.
From Democrats and the American Left -- the U.S. equivalent to the people who run Canada -- we are still hearing that the disaster in New Orleans showed a heartless, white Republican America had abandoned its underclass.

This is garbage. The great majority of those not evacuated lived in assisted housing, receive food stamps and prescription medicine and government support through many other programmes. Many have, all their lives, expected someone to lift them to safety, sans input from themselves. And the demagogic mayor they elected left, quite literally, hundreds of transit and school buses parked in rows to be lost in the flood, that could have driven them out of town.

Yes, that was insensitive. But it is also the truth; and sooner or later we must acknowledge that welfare dependency creates exactly the sort of haplessness and social degeneration we saw on display, as the floodwaters rose. Many suffered terribly, and many died, and one's heart goes out. But already the survivors are being put up in new accommodations, and their various entitlements have been directed to new locations.

The scale of private charity has also been unprecedented. There are yet no statistics, but I'll wager the most generous state in the union will prove to have been arch-Republican Texas, and that nationally, contributions in cash and kind are coming disproportionately from people who vote Republican. For the world divides into "the mouths" and "the wallets".

The whole article is worth the read, but at least ONE person in Canada understands the reality of dependency, welfare and the need for a military.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Pelosi turns back pork...unlike GOP

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/28/2005

OK, so it is going to cost a ton to rebuild improve New Orleans. Where is that going to come from? It damn well better not be at the expense of the measley tax cuts. It better be funded by reducing other spending.

From the San Francisco Chronicle.

Sadly the Republicans are protecting their spending wish lists.
House Majority Leader Rep. Tom DeLay, R-TX, said that while he would consider cutting all other domestic discretionary spending to raise the tens of billions of dollars needed for Katrina relief, it was a bad idea to take money from transportation projects.

His suburban Houston district is slated to get $64.4 million under the bill, and DeLay has said that he brought home an additional $50 million for freeway projects in the metropolitan area. He also helped secure $324 million in funding credits for Houston's light rail construction.

On the flip side are the Democrats:
House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, said Tuesday she was willing to return to the federal Treasury $70 million designated for San Francisco projects in the new highway and transportation bill and use the money to help pay for Hurricane Katrina recovery efforts.

Sad reversal of roles when the Dems freak show leader understands the concept of eliminating pork for need better than the GOP leaders.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Notre Dame coach keeps promise

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/28/2005

(H/T Betsy's Page)
Sometimes faith in humanity can be restored in such a touching manner. This is one of those stories.
Charlie Weis doesn't usually let anyone else call plays on offense. He made an exception for 10-year-old Montana Mazurkiewicz.

The Notre Dame coach met last week with Montana, who had been told by doctors weeks earlier that there was nothing more they could do to stop the spread of his inoperable brain tumor.

"He was a big Notre Dame fan in general, but football especially," said his mother, Cathy Mazurkiewicz.

Weis showed up at the Mazurkiewicz home in Mishawaka, just east of South Bend, and talked with Montana about his tumor and about Weis' 10-year-old daughter, Hannah, who has global development delay, a rare disorder similar to autism.

He told Montana about some pranks he played on Joe Montana -- whom Montana was named after -- while they were roommates at Notre Dame.

"I gave him a chance to hammer me on the Michigan State loss, which he did very well. He reminded me of my son," said Weis, whose son, Charlie Jr., is 12 years old.

Weis said the meeting was touching.

"He told me about his love for Notre Dame football and how he just wanted to make it through this game this week," Weis said. "He just wanted to be able to live through this game because he knew he wasn't going to live very much longer."

As Weis talked to the boy, Cathy Mazurkiewicz rubbed her son's shoulder trying to ease his pain. Weis said he could tell the boy was trying not to show he was in pain.

His mother told Montana, who had just become paralyzed from the waist down a day earlier because of the tumor, to toss her a football Weis had given him. Montana tried to throw the football, put could barely lift it. So Weis climbed into the reclining chair with him and helped him complete the pass to his mother.

Before leaving, Weis signed the football.

"He wrote, 'Live for today for tomorrow is always another day,"' Mazurkiewicz said.

"He told him: 'You can't worry about tomorrow. Just live today for everything it has and everything you can appreciate,'" she said. "He said: 'If you're (in pain) today you might not necessarily be in pain tomorrow, or it might be worse. But there's always another day.'"

Weis asked Montana if there was something he could do for him. He agreed to let Montana call the first play against Washington on Saturday. He called "pass right."

Montana never got to see the play. He died Friday at his home.

Weis heard about the death and called Mazurkiewicz on Friday night to assure her he would still call Montana's play.

"He said, 'This game is for Montana, and the play still stands,'" she said.

Weis said he told the team about the visit. He said it wasn't a "Win one for the Gipper" speech, because he doesn't believe in using individuals as inspiration. He just wanted the team to know people like Montana are out there.

"That they represent a lot of people that they don't even realize they're representing," Weis said.

When the Irish started on their own 1-yard-line following a fumble recovery, Mazurkiewicz wasn't sure Notre Dame would be able to throw a pass. Weis was concerned about that, too. So was quarterback Brady Quinn.

"He said 'What are we going to do?'" Weis said. "I said 'We have no choice. We're throwing it to the right.'"

Weis called a play where most of the Irish went left, Quinn ran right and looked for tight end Anthony Fasano on the right.

Mazurkiewicz watched with her family.

"I just closed my eyes. I thought, 'There's no way he's going to be able to make that pass. Not from where they're at. He's going to get sacked and Washington's going to get two points,'" she said.

Fasano caught the pass and leapt over a defender for a 13-yard gain.

The article goes on, but really, what more is there to say?
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Tuesday, September 27, 2005

One more Satan Angel killed

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/27/2005

Another of Satan's evil doers has been killed.

See story here
U.S. and Iraqi authorities said Tuesday their forces had killed the No. 2 official in the al-Qaida in Iraq organization in a weekend raid in Baghdad, claiming to have struck a “painful blow” to the country’s most feared insurgent group.

Abdullah Abu Azzam led al-Qaida’s operations in Baghdad, planning a brutal wave of suicide bombings in the capital since April, killing hundreds of people, officials said. He also controlled the finances for foreign fighters that flowed into Iraq to join the insurgency.

Celebrations to be had. A round on me!
Al-Qaida in Iraq denied that Abu Azzam was the No. 2 leader of the organization and said “it was not confirmed” that he was killed. “Abu Azzam was one of al-Qaida’s many soldiers and is the leader of one of its battalions operating in Baghdad,” the group said in an Internet statement by its spokesman, Abu Maysara al-Iraqi.

It called the U.S. and Iraqi claims that he was the group’s top deputy “a futile attempt ... to raise the morale of their troops.”
Uh, he wasn't important but we are going to deny he was killed. Whatever, you lying pieces of ****.
It was not immediately clear what effect Abu Azzam’s death would have on al-Qaida in Iraq, which has been one of the deadliest militant groups, carrying out suicide attacks that targeted the country’s Shiite majority. The U.S. military has claimed to have killed or captured leading al-Zarqawi aides in the past and attacks have continued unabated — although Abu Azzam appeared to be a more significant figure.

Iraqi government spokesman Laith Kubba called the killing of Abu Azzam a “painful blow” to al-Qaida, but warned that the group would likely carry out revenge attacks.

Abu Azzam was killed early Sunday when U.S. and Iraqi forces raided a high-rise apartment building in Baghdad, Lt. Col. Steve Boylan, a U.S. military spokesman, told the AP.

“They went in to capture him, he did not surrender, and he was killed in the raid,” Boylan said.

The Iraqi and U.S. forces targeted the building after a tip from an Iraqi citizen, Kubba said. During the raid, the troops captured another militant in the apartment with Abu Azzam, Kubba said.

This dude was an evil dude.
Abu Azzam — whose real name is Abdullah Najim Abdullah Mohamed Al-Jawari — was the No. 2 figure in al-Qaida in Iraq, Kubba and Boylan said.

He had claimed responsibility for the assassinations of a number of top politicians, including a car bomb in May 2004 that killed Izzadine Saleem, the president of the U.S.-appointed Governing Council, and a July 2004 attack that killed the governor of Nineveh province, the military said.

He was the group’s “amir” or leader in Anbar, the vast western province that is the heartland of the insurgency, until spring, when he became the amir in Baghdad and led operations in and around the capital. He was “responsible for the recent upsurge in violent attacks in the city since April 2005,” the military said.

And other successes this weekend that you will not hear about:
Abu Azzam’s death was followed by two other successes against al-Qaida in Iraq’s leadership, officials said — the group’s leader in the northern city of Mosul surrendered to the Iraqi military, and its leader in the town of Karabila in the sensitive region near the Syrian border was killed.

The Karabila leader, identified only as Abu Nasser, died along with several others Monday in a raid on the group’s headquarters in the city, Kubba told a news conference, without elaborating. Gen. Wafiq al-Samaraei, the Iraqi president’s national security adviser, said Abu Nasser was killed in a U.S. airstrike. The U.S. military confirmed an airstrike in the region Monday, but gave no details on casualties.

I do think that over the next month the violence will get really bad. They know they are on the ropes and will try even harder to intimidate the people before the national referendum on Iraq’s draft constitution.

On top of that will be retribution violence. But the bottom line is that we are winning and they know they have to act quickly. No longer can they patiently plan these attacks or they will lose Iraq.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Playmate to be heard in Supreme Court

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/27/2005

This will be interesting.
Former Playboy model Anna Nicole Smith is going to the Supreme Court. Justices said Tuesday they would consider Smith's appeal over the fortune of her 90-year-old late husband.

The stripper-turned-reality television star stands to win as much as $474 million that a bankruptcy judge initially said she was entitled to. The case will be argued before the justices early next year.

She has not gotten any money from the estate of J. Howard Marshall II, an oil tycoon who married her in 1994 when he was 89 and she was 26. Marshall, one of Texas' wealthiest men, died in 1995.
And no, I do not think she was a gold-digger. Strippers always fall in love with their 'johns', don't they?
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Extra 52 seconds in game

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/27/2005

I did not even notice this happening.
A clock error added 52 seconds to the fourth quarter of the Patriots-Steelers game Sunday. The extra time aided the Patriots during a winning drive that ended with Adam Vinatieri's 43-yard field goal with 1 second remaining.
...
The NFL acknowledged the mistake Monday, with director of officiating Mike Pereira issuing a statement: "The on-field officiating crew, which oversees the official game clock operated in the press box, failed to recognize that the clock was improperly reset."

I don't know about it really aiding the Patriots. Just on a very basic level the playcalling in the middle of the 4th quarter would have been vastly different without the error. Maybe New England would have passed a little more (since there would be less time on the clock) and that would have better set up a draw play for a touchdown. Maybe, maybe, maybe.

What actually happened:
The mistake occurred after the second play of the fourth quarter, a reverse by Steelers wide receiver Cedrick Wilson for no gain on second-and-10 from the Pittsburgh 30 with the Steelers ahead 13-10.

There were 14 minutes, 51 seconds remaining when the play started and, by the time, a false start penalty was called on Steelers guard Kendall Simmons, the Heinz Field clock had run down to 13:59.

But before the next play started, the clock reverted back to 14:51 -- the time left before the Wilson run. Ben Roethlisberger's incompletion on third-and-15 lasted 14 seconds and Chris Gardocki's 51-yard punt took up 10 seconds, meaning the Patriots got the ball back with 14:19 remaining in the game rather than 13:27 if the error hadn't occurred.

OK...so how was it noticed?
According to former NFL official Chuck Heberling, who observes the officials in a league-appointed capacity, an NFL employee in New York spotted the error and immediately called officials supervisor Johnny Grier. Grier was sitting with Heberling in the press box.

Now someone else had to have noticed, right?
"We checked it out with the statisticians and, according to his records, everything seemed to be all right," Heberling said. As a result, no move was made to try to correct the error.

The mistake showed up when the officiating crew, headed by referee Bill Carollo, reviewed the CBS game tape with Grier and Heberling during their usual post-game meeting in a Pittsburgh hotel.

"When we ran the tape, it was obvious it (the clock) was jumping," Heberling said.

The clock operators -- there are two, one for the game clock and the other for the play clock -- are locally based but hired by the league. The Steelers did not identify them, and they are not listed with the other officials on the league's statistical report.
That means 2 clock operators did not say anything, 2 officials did not notice, the statisticians did not catch the error and the crowd in Pittsburgh did not say/yell anything. The broadcasters (television and radio) for the Patriots, Steelers and CBS did not catch it.

What the hell?

Now back to the "affect on the game". Even if we assume that most of the playcalling and the results were all unchanged I would say the outcome would not have changed.
The mistake caused the final quarter to last 15 minutes, 52 seconds, extra time that proved invaluable to New England after the Steelers tied it at 20 on Roethlisberger's 4-yard touchdown pass to Hines Ward with 1:21 remaining.

After New England got the ball at its 38, Tom Brady needed only 31 seconds to complete passes of 17, 14 and 6 yards to set up Vinatieri's third field goal of the game. Forty-five seconds ran off between the time Brady found David Givens for 6 yards to the Steelers 25 and Vinatieri kicked the decisive field goal.
Forty-five of the 52 seconds are right there. Two other plays occurred...the pass of 17 yards and the pass of 14 yards. Vinaterri's range would have easily covered that extra 6 yards...so that takes care of :45 seconds. There was also a run for no yardage that spent 16 seconds. There is 1:01 that easily can be argued would have been made up with a hurry up offense.

But the Steelers owner keeps it all in perspective:
Steelers president Dan Rooney was unaware of the mistake until being alerted Monday by reporters.

"There's nothing to say. The game's over," Rooney said. "It's not going to change the score."

A strange occurance to be sure.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

How sad life must be

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/27/2005

Just an open question...How sad must someone's life be for them to spend every waking moment obsessed with the sheer destruction and hatred of another being?

Eva's life must truly be pathetic for her. She spends so much energy on trying to bring about Michele Bachmann's ruination that one has to wonder. I have concluded that Eva actually is in love (as much as someone as mentally deranged could be) with Eva's target and the only way she can justify the stalking of Eva's target to her gay friends is to put up the hateful facade. In fact, her animosity seems to actually be a combination of intense jealousy and deep emptiness in knowing that Eva can never be with her target.

That is my official determination.

That and Eva's life has to be pretty sad.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Monday, September 26, 2005

Sports builds character

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/26/2005

Vikings players AGAIN in trouble.
Two starting offensive linemen on the Minnesota Vikings were arrested shortly after 3 a.m. today when they refused to leave a 24-hour service station where a crowd had gathered, according to Minneapolis police.

Bryant McKinnie, 26, and Marcus Johnson, 23, were charged with disorderly conduct and obstruction of justice, which are misdemeanors, and were released from the Hennepin County jail early today after they each posted $50 bail.

Witnesses gave various accounts of the incident at the service station.
You think so? I mean, there are die-hard Vikings fans that would like about a murder to protect their beloved purple.

Jared Scheeler, a manager at the service station, said that he had originally called police because a woman customer had become unruly. He said that security guards who work at the store had handcuffed her. It appears that the woman was not connected to the Vikings entourage.

A group of individuals with McKinnie was standing inside the store when a another man who was getting a drink out of the cooler shouted at McKinnie, making a reference to Miami, and it "could have been an insult," Scheeler said.

The men apparently exchanged words and McKinnie's teammates were trying to get him to back off. At some point during the argument, two police officers arrived. "He (McKinnie) kept arguing with the guy," said Scheeler. "Police were telling him to stop. He wouldn't. They attempted to cuff him. There seemed to be a little resistance (by McKinnie) but not much."
Yet we should subsidize their place of employment because they are such great role models and sports builds character.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Cindy going where she belongs

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/26/2005

This story gives me joy.
Cindy Sheehan, the California woman who has used her son’s death in Iraq to spur the anti-war movement, was arrested Monday while protesting outside the White House.

Sheehan and several dozen other protesters sat down on the sidewalk after marching along the pedestrian walkway on Pennsylvania Avenue. Police warned them three times that they were breaking the law by failing to move along, then began making arrests.
Good. Let that be on their records. Of course, I doubt any of them are candidates for decent jobs anyway.

The story put at the end the most important part of the whole story.
On Sunday, a rally supporting the war drew roughly 500 participants. Speakers included veterans of World War II and the war in Iraq, as well as family members of soldiers killed in Iraq.

“I would like to say to Cindy Sheehan and her supporters, ‘Don’t be a group of unthinking lemmings.’ It’s not pretty,” said Mitzy Kenny of Ridgeley, W.Va., whose husband died in Iraq last year. The anti-war demonstrations “can affect the war in a really negative way. It gives the enemy hope.”
And that was without the help of the media promoting this rally. See, the media is NOT objective.
***** 1 refutations and clarifications *****

Sunday, September 25, 2005

Today's Show

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/25/2005

I have not really made it a habit to summarize or comment on shows that we have completed, but this one was different.

First we had more guests than we had chairs. Marty had the idea of bringing some bloggers in for analysis. He chose Mitch Berg, King Banaian, and Andy Aplikowski.

Secondly this show was one of the most fun events I have been to politically in a LONG time.

Mostly I had the chance to learn A TON from Mitch and King. They are part of the Northern Alliance Radio Network and have a lot of radio experience that I take notes from. Invaluable is the only way I can describe all that I got from them today both during the show and after.

Some of the wrap-up:
Andy at Residual Forces recapped it here.
I don’t quite know what to say about Jay Esmay’s call into the show. I’ve been trying to be fair and balanced to all the candidates on this blog, and I was attempting to on the show today. We were discussing Esmay and we kind of… were… well… tough on him. I think all is fair in ‘love and ploitics’ [sic]. Maybe I was mis-stating his positions, but the others were not exactly on his side. I don’t remember the specific exchange, but I can say this. If you are ever a candidate for office, and someone is talking about you on the radio in unflattering ways, don’t call in unless they ask you to.

Yep, Marty said that Jay Esmay kind of dodged some questions and Esmay called in to defend himself. His exact words to the screener were, "Jay Esmay doesn't dodge questions." It was a very interesting exchange between Mitch, Marty and Jay which I think Jay's inexperience ended up hurting him a bit.

King's pre-show comment:
I'll be on Race to the Right on KNSI with Martin Andrade tomorrow. 1-3pm at 1450 KNSI; at last local folks can hear me without a webstream. Not local? Marty's got streaming action. BTW, Marty, it's Banaian. Every other letter is an 'A'. Just ask Foot: He always spells my name so well.
Thanks...I think I have brutalized the spelling as well.

Mitch's pre-show comment:
I'm going to be appearing on Race To The Right, on KNSI (AM1450 in Saint Cloud, plus available on the website) with King, Andy from Residual Forces, as well as hosts Tony Garcia and Marty Andrade. We're going to be talking about the Sixth District house race, among many other things.


Marty's summary:
Race to the Right was a blast today. King Banaian is awesome, Mitch Berg is almost as awesome (but "classier") Andy Aplikowski was pronouncable for the first half hour, and Tony and I did our normal walk through excellence.

Too bad Psycmiester didn't ID himself, else we could have had a lot more fun with him and his comments (Next time buddy). Even my mother, who doesn't like conservative radio all that much, enjoyed listening to the show.

And speaking of Psycmeister, he did call twice. We could not let him on a second time as a caller and we did not know that he was a fellow MOBster. Sorry, Leo. His comments are here. Actually he gave us the 11 reasons that he should have been invited to join us on the show.

Podcast is available...just click here.

**********UPDATE**********
The podcast link is fixed and working.
***** 1 refutations and clarifications *****

Saturday, September 24, 2005

Crazy weatherman...or dead on accurate

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/24/2005

Some theories are just fun to read...and if they make you wonder then that is just a bonus.
This story about an Idaho weather forecaster was interesting.
Scott Stevens is the Idaho weatherman who blames the Japanese Mafia for Hurricane Katrina. To folks in Pocatello...
...
Since Katrina, Stevens has been in newspapers across the country where he was quoted in an Associated Press story as saying the Yakuza Mafia used a Russian-made electromagnetic generator to cause Hurricane Katrina in a bid to avenge the atomic bomb attack on Hiroshima. He was a guest on Coast to Coast, a late night radio show that conducts call-in discussions on everything from bizarre weather patterns to alien abductions. On Wednesday, Stevens was interviewed by Fox News firebrand Bill O'Reilly.

And what of his theories?
Although the theories espoused by Stevens - scalar weapons, global dimming - are definitely on the scientific fringe today, there are thousands of Web sites that mention such phenomena.

"The Soviets boasted of their geoengineering capabilities; these impressive accomplishments must be taken at face value simply because we are observing weather events that simply have never occurred before, never!" Stevens wrote on his Web site. "The evidence of these weapons at work found within the clouds overhead is simply unmistakable. These patterns and odd geometric shapes seen in our skies, each and every day, are clear and present evidence that our weather has been stolen from us, only to be used by those whose designs for humanity are rarely in alignment with that of the common man."

One aside to all of the global warming broadcasters. Take a lesson from this guy:
Stevens never discussed his weather theories on the air during his time at Channel 6 - an agreement he had with the station management. What the meteorologist chose to do in his off time was his business, said his manager of eight years.
And you global warming freaks OUGHT to do the same.

Stevens has his own website on the matter.
A battle in the skies is waged daily. Some battles are won and others lost. We yet know not which. For years this massive global project has been under way, but only now is it making it to the forefront of the consciousness of those with curious minds. These open minds know that every belief system fails; and only fails, under the weight of new truthful information. This is how progress is made, slowly and often only with the passing of a generation of humankind.
...
As a television weatherman I first met this information with skepticism, who wouldn't? Almost completely rejecting the concept that weather modification outside of cloud seeding possible. Additional clues kept creeping in until I came across examples of scalar weather engineering on Tom Bearden's web site. Soon I began looking for my own examples in my own skies. Whoa! There they were! And not just occasionally, but all the time! Examples in highs clouds were the easiest to spot, much less convective turbulence to round out the edges. Mid level clouds. the alto cumulus are now frequently gridded and square. Odd, very odd I thought. Lower clouds, cumulus and stratus, especially in a marine layer environment seem to be the most difficult in which to see the active grid. But it is there.

He quotes another website that I will eventually peruse.

Just something to make you go, "Hmmm."
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Kill them all

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/24/2005

During the pull out this summer from the Gaza strip I decided that Israel should destroy Palestine if the Palestinians violate the peace agreement. I say this morning, "Israel, you may commence with elimination."

The Arabs and the anti-Semites (read "liberals who support Palestine") around the world have only been looking for any reason to attack Israel (literally or verbally) and Friday they created their reason when there was an explosion at a rally in the Gaza strip.
Hamas blamed Israel and said it fired rockets on Israeli border towns in retaliation. However, the Palestinian Authority described the explosion as an accident that happened when Islamic militants mishandled explosives and renewed demands that armed groups stop flaunting their weapons.

So what happened after the explosion? Hamas launched rockets and hit some Israeli towns.

(Remember, the left in this country does not think that Hamas should be listed as a terrorist group like Al Qaeda.)

What will Israel's response be?
Israel ordered ground forces to the Gaza border Saturday and threatened a "crushing" response after Israeli towns were hit by the first major Hamas rocket barrage from the coastal territory since Israel's pullout two weeks earlier.

Israel also resumed airstrikes against Hamas targets, hitting several suspected weapons workshops, and imposed a blanket closure that bars all Palestinians from its territory.

I am a bit disappointed there will be such a small response. Go in and slit the throat of each and every member of Hamas. Burn their houses, businesses and mosques. If the other occupants do not want a similar fate then they will not allow Hamas into their buildings.

Put the Palestinian Authority in the middle of choosing sides. Tell them to bring all of the members of Hamas to Israel immediately (say 14 days) for execution. If the PA does not comply then go in and do it yourselves.

Whatever Israel does to respond I will support.

And I guarantee that the anti-Semite organization known as the United Nations will condemn everything Israel does. The gutless European Union will continue to align themselves against Israel. I'm beginning to think it was a shame that we helped them rebuild after World War II.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Thursday, September 22, 2005

Storm coverage hysteria

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/22/2005

OK, before I "report" the dumbest thing ever said during storm coverage I have a confession to make. I am a big fan of baseball. Why is that germane? Because baseball announcers (and some fans) try to make every single at-bat more important than every other at-bat in history. ("If Bubba Marconi Walker hits a single here it will be the first time in history that someone with BMW initials got a hit on the day after a bad storm in a neighboring suburb.")

So last night we are driving home between the storms (and since our drive is so long we actually got caught in the second and between the 2nd & 3rd storms). We were listening to WCCO radio for whatever reason. I do not know whose voices belonged to which names but I do know that one of the people was Mike Lynch.

Talk about melodramatic! I heard this quote and nearly drove of the road from shock at the stupidity of the comment.
Some of the trees being destroyed are over 100 years old. Make no mistake, tonight the very face of the cities is being changed forever.
OK, I understand trying to fill air time and sometimes stupid stuff exits the mouth. Maybe he didn't mean it. In the meantime my wife and I were discussing how overdone the quote was (she didn't hear it and thought maybe I was making it out to be dumber than it was).

Thirty minutes later he said it again. And about 5 minutes after that he said it again. I would bet money he was crying as he said it.

No wonder we get numb to coverage for the big stuff when these idiots fail to keep things in perspective.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Global Warming is universal

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/21/2005

It seems that polar ice deposits are shrinking in the south pole. In fact, according to NASA scientists it seems that Global Warming is a universal thing.

Why?

Because it is happening on Mars. Now how the hell will the global-warming chicken-littles figure out how to double talk this one?
And for three Mars summers in a row, deposits of frozen carbon dioxide near Mars' south pole have shrunk from the previous year's size, suggesting a climate change in progress.
Eeks, I guess that means the California Emissions Standards were not strong enough. If only Kyoto were signed 4 years ago it would have prevented the Universe Warming. We're all doomed.

Oh, I guess that would not have been in time..."Mars years are nearly twice as long as Earth years". Maybe if Kyoto were created back when the "climate change" fanatics were preaching about the next ice age we could have prevented this tragedy.

In all seriousness this leads more weight to the hard scientists that have been saying "climate change" is not at all influenced by us humans. We can neither cause it nor prevent it. The "scientists" that overwhelmingly agree that evil humans are the cause of any type of climate change are for the most part SOCIAL scientists...you know, like sociologists, psychologist, philosophers and political scientists. To them I would suggest they go back to their own "science" and concentrate on perfecting their own practices.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

New Porn Squad at the FBI

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/20/2005

(H/T: Jon J)
We have the War on Drugs and the War on Terror. Now there is a new war: War on Porn. This Washington Post article explains.
Early last month, the bureau's Washington Field Office began recruiting for a new anti-obscenity squad. Attached to the job posting was a July 29 Electronic Communication from FBI headquarters to all 56 field offices, describing the initiative as "one of the top priorities" of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and, by extension, of "the Director." That would be FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III.

That's all fine and dandy, but what about our other current Wars and their resources?
The new squad will divert eight agents, a supervisor and assorted support staff to gather evidence against "manufacturers and purveyors" of pornography -- not the kind exploiting children, but the kind that depicts, and is marketed to, consenting adults.

To this I say that porn, gambling, drinking, drugs and prostitution all should be treated the same way: if consenting adults wish to engage in it then so be it as long as they are not directly harming society (i.e. with other crimes). It's the libertarian in me, I guess. Furthermore this should NOT be a federal issue, but a state by state issue.

This is a big hit with Christian Coalition.
But Gonzales endorses the rationale of predecessor Meese: that adult pornography is a threat to families and children. Christian conservatives, long skeptical of Gonzales, greeted the pornography initiative with what the Family Research Council called "a growing sense of confidence in our new attorney general."

This is just one more instance of Bush expanding the Federal government (and its intrusion into private lives) not to mention the indefensible act of legislating morality for the sake of morality.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Hurricane names

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/20/2005

(H/T: Betsy's Page)
Here is a cool article about hurricane names.
Each year, 21 common names are reserved for Atlantic Basin hurricanes, with the list arranged alphabetically and skipping certain letters. Rita is the 17th named storm in the Atlantic Basin this year. There are only four left.

So what will officials do after tropical storm Wilma develops, assuming it does?

"We go to the Greek alphabet," said Frank Lepore, spokesman for the National Hurricane Center.

Having a little deja vu about some of the names this year?
The twenty-one names reserved each year (the letters q, u, x, y and z are not used) are recycled every six years, minus those retired (such as Hugo and Andrew and, you can bet, Katrina). When a name is retired, the WMO chooses a new name to replace it.

Now, before you global warming theologues get started read the following:

The year with the most documented tropical storms was 1933, when there were 21 in the Atlantic Basin, but this was before hurricanes were routinely named.

Some studies have suggested that global warming may be causing increases in hurricane intensity and frequency, but many scientists are skeptical.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Monday, September 19, 2005

Empty Amtrak

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/19/2005

I admit, I did not read as many articles about Katrina as were written on my regular blogs. I did not really see much in the mainstream media that would have had the following information.

I was going through my FactCheck.org e-mail updates. There was one titled "Katrina: What Happened When". I wanted to find out about the buses that just sat throughout the city instead of being used by the Mayor to help with the evacuation. Instead I came across this one:
Sunday, Aug. 28 2005 - 1 Day Prior
...
8:30 p.m. - An empty Amtrak train leaves New Orleans, with room for thousands of potential evacuees. "We offered the city the opportunity to take evacuees out of harm's way…The city declined," said Amtrak spokesman Cliff Black. The train left New Orleans no passengers on board.

—Susan Glasser, "The Steady Buildup to a City's Chaos," The Washington Post , 11 Sep 2005.

Two weeks later, Nagin denies on NBC's Meet the Press that Amtrak offered their services. "Amtrak never contacted me to make that offer," the mayor tells host Tim Russert. "I have never gotten that call, Tim, and I would love to have had that call. But it never happened."

—"Interview with Mayor Nagin," Meet the Press, NBC, 11 Sep 2005.

Sorry, Nagin, I'm gonna take Amtrak's word on this one.

Still, the point is that while so many have been rushing to blame Bush since Day 1 the proper amount of scorn has not been directed to the IDIOTS that were running the city and the state.

What was their plan in the event of a major hurricane? Panic.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Radio Show Podcasts

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/19/2005

Normally we would try to get a little bit of feedback from the listeners on a service for the listeners. Yesterday we did not consider the feedback at all.

We have decided, for a limited trial period, to provide podcasts of the show. I think they will be provided on this blog on the main page as well as on the Race to the Right section. We have not decided how long to keep them up. I'm thinking 2 weeks worth.

I have to add that we have our reservations about the success vs effort on this feature. If we do not see a consistent amount of usage we will revisit the practice...so help make it successful.

Yesterday's show: Click here
9/11 show: Click here
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Moon missions a hoax

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/19/2005

Here are some breaking photos that add validity to the claims that the moon missions were a government hoax performed in a Hollywood studio.

I mean, if Bush letting his entourage know that he will be leaving soon is news then why should this not be?
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Friday, September 16, 2005

Sports Builds Character

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/16/2005

(H/T: Jon J)
This story shows us yet again how sports builds character (a common excuse by pro-stadium advocates).
Tampa Bay rookie fullback Rick Razzano was suspended four games Friday by the NFL for violating the league's policy on anabolic steroids.

Razzano, a seventh-round draft pick from Mississippi, said through the team that he tested positive for a substance he used in training before joining the Buccaneers. He did not identify the substance.

"I take full responsibility for my mistake and encourage all athletes to be fully aware of all substances which may be prohibited by the NCAA or their respective sports and leagues," Razzano said.

"I apologize to my family, my coaches, teammates, the ownership and Buccaneer fans for the embarrassment and distraction I have caused. Let my experience be a further lesson for all."

Razzano, a third-stringer who plays behind Mike Alstott and Jameel Cook, was inactive for last Sunday's season opener at Minnesota. He will be eligible to return to the active roster on Oct. 10, a day after Tampa Bay plays the New York Jets.

The suspension follows the arrests this week of reserve cornerback Torrie Cox and offensive assistant Jay Gruden, younger brother of Bucs coach Jon Gruden, on drunken driving charges.

Yep, 3 people busted in this story.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Thursday, September 15, 2005

Don't let the door hit ya

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/15/2005

Trey at Alamo Nation could not have said it better:
Apparently American actress Gwyneth Paltrow doesn't want to live in the country that made her a rich celebrity anymore due to "Bush's anti-environment, pro-war policies." Now I bring this up for two reasons. Firstly, I now have to lump an actress whose work I enjoy (or used to enjoy before today) into a growing category of leftist jackass celebrities whose work I can no longer pay my hard earned money to follow. Again I hold up celebrities like Paltrow and Tim Robbins and compare them to oh say Tom Hanks and Owen Wilson. All are liberal, make no mistake. But two of those would politely disagree with a Republican president's policies (at least in public that is and that's what we're concerned about) while the other two are all too willing to want to move out of the country or throw terms around like "fascist" or "warmonger" or "Nazi" or whatever else their egotistical minds hurl out to inflate their own sense of self worth. Paltrow doesn't want to live in America. Fine, we're better off without her. Think you'd ever hear Tom Hanks say the same thing?

(His source: here)
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Lynn Swann for Gov

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/15/2005

(H/T: SD63)
I have always liked Lynn Swann as a player and as a commentator. I guess he is considering running for governor out in Pennsylvania.
"I think this is an opportunity for me to use my talents to help the people of Pennsylvania," Swann said to ESPN.com in an exclusive interview. "I think we can be much better than we have been in recent years. I believe Pennsylvania needs leadership from outside the box."

If not Condi in '08 then my next pick is Swann '08.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****

Wednesday, September 14, 2005

Prayer in school allowed for some

--posted by Tony Garcia on 9/14/2005

(H/T: Conservative Princess)
I thought that prayer in school was not allowed? Public schools are considered part of the state and thus the strict wall of seperation between church & state is required. This is, after all, the legal justification the militant gay theology used to try to kick the Boy Scouts out of the schools.

So then comes this story which demonstrates the reality. Only Christianity is not allowed to be practiced in any manner within the public schools.
The 14-year-old was told she couldn't, and went home distraught that afternoon in October 2003. Praying five times a day is a cornerstone of her Muslim faith.

"If I wasn't allowed to pray my second prayer at school, I couldn't do it at home," she said. "When school finishes, the third prayer begins."

Her family contacted a Muslim advocacy group, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which asked the school district to reconsider. Eventually, the district acknowledged it had no policy preventing a student from praying on his or her own during free time, and allowed Yasmeen to use an empty classroom to unfurl her prayer rug, face Mecca and touch her head to the floor in a few moments of worship.
Oh, but the story does not stop there. The story (inadvertantly) shows that this is not isolated but a very concerted effort to push for special Muslim religious rights within the schools.
Her case was part of a nationwide grassroots effort by Muslim parents to make public schools more friendly and accommodating to Muslim students. The movement has gained strength since the September 11, 2001, terror attacks.
Yep, the movement to allow Muslim prayer in school while still fighting against any Christianity practicing child from praying GREW STRONGER after 9/11. Now, we can argue why but I will postulate that the hate/blame America crowd who think that terrorism is not really "an enemy we can fight" have been aiding & abetting Muslim and Middle-Eastern infiltration. This is not a bad thing except the Left willingly include suspected & known terrorists in this protection. This story is a result of the idea that terrorists get American Constitutional protections.

The AP writer is not happy with that. They then go into a dramatization of how Muslims are victims.
"The reality for many Muslim students in public schools is very difficult," said Ingrid Mattson, vice president of the Islamic Society of North America. "It's highly stressful."

She said her children were sometimes taunted in their Connecticut [a blue state] school district.

"The kids will say 'Hey Osama, do you have a bomb? Are you going to blow us up?"' she said. "My daughter has had people try to pull her head scarf off, or say 'What are you doing with that rag on your head?' But they have also had friends who defended them."
Two things to this. One, all groups of kids do this kind of thing to all other groups of kids. Two, this is what kids do. As long as the kids are not inflicting damage to each other's property or inflicting physical harm then this is just schoolyard banter. Shut up and get over it.

Stop being a victim and be a survivor. If you REALLY do not like the link to terroristic murderers then start to publicly condemn them. That is how people work. Next thing you know the "victims" will be asking for SPECIAL treatment.

Whoops, too late:
A zero-tolerance policy on harassment of Muslim students was adopted by Florida's Broward County school board in March 2003, just before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.


Some more victimhood:
Noor Ennab, a fifth-grader who attends the private Muslim Al-Noor School in New York City, said she was driven out of her public school by post-September 11 harassment.

"Before that (the 2001 terror attacks) happened, we were treated so kind," she said. "Now it's like, 'You're a terrorist; get out of this country."'
So, Noor, did people actually say "You're a terrorist" or is this the result of your paraphrasing your perception? If it is your perception then, well, get a little bit thicker skin would be my advice. If people actually said that to you then your opportunity to denounce the terrorists as evil misrepresentations of your religion was missed. Did you say that you 100% disagree with those terrorists proclamations, methods or targets? I'm guessing not.

"I don't want to be hated by other people," said Rohani, who attends the Al-Noor School in Brooklyn, New York, and said she was harassed by non-Muslims after 9/11. "I didn't do anything wrong. I would go home to my mom and cry. I started saying, 'No, I'm not Arabic.' But I don't want to deny who I am."
Actually, if you did not denounce the evil that is Muslim terrorism then you are doing something wrong in a sense. You are tacitly supporting the terrorists. See, life is about action-reaction. Action: not unequivocally denouncing Muslim terrorists; Reaction: people will not like you.

Plain and simple. Oh yeah, and the Christians are still under attack in the schools.

********** UPDATE ********** 11/30/05
Source link is dead. New link for story is here.
***** 0 refutations and clarifications *****